Which aspect is NOT a result of lower scanning time in PET compared to SPECT?

Lower scanning time in PET compared to SPECT has several advantages, and recognizing which aspect is not a result of this shortened time frame is crucial. The response indicating "Lower Quality Images" as not being a beneficial outcome is accurate because one of the strengths of PET imaging is its ability to produce high-quality images, even with shorter scan times.

When scan times are decreased, PET can maintain clarity and detail due to its advanced technology and more sophisticated imaging techniques. This leads to higher patient throughput, which means more patients can be scanned in a given time, enhancing the efficiency of the workflow in a clinical setting. Additionally, reduced scanning time contributes to decreased patient exposure to radiation since they spend less time in the scanner, further emphasizing patient safety.

Thus, while image quality can occasionally suffer in different modalities if not properly managed, the inherent capabilities of PET ensure that shorter scan times do not typically correlate with lower quality images. Therefore, the notion of reduced scan time resulting in "Lower Quality Images" does not hold true in the context of PET's advantages, making it the correct choice in identifying which aspect is not a direct consequence of decreased scanning time.